Work with us
AI tools / Developer and coding AI / Cursor

How to govern Cursor

An AI code editor that edits files and runs commands across a codebase, often without a review of each step.

Anysphere · Reviewed quarterly, and when the vendor ships a capability change or a customer declares the tool · Last reviewed 16 Oct 2026

Governance change Reviewed the changelog from 1 September to 13 October. Projects adds a cloud coordinator agent that plans work, runs many sub-agents, keeps shared memory across machines and can act on Slack, schedule or pull-request events without being prompted. Agent execution can run on self-hosted machines with computer use, mobile remote control of local agents is on by default outside Enterprise, and an app marketplace grants third-party apps write access to checks and reviews. Full changelog ↓

How Cursor is used

We see two common ways businesses use Cursor, and we govern each one on its own terms. If your team uses it differently, that is fine: you describe the use in your own words and Certrak works out the governance from what it actually does.

Code generation and review

Consequence to people: Medium

Writing or reviewing code, with a developer in the loop

Internal informationEvery output reviewedInternal use onlyRuns code or scriptsActs on its own
  • Review rhythm: Monthly check-in
  • Governance is mostly about: Safe everyday use; A person stays accountable; What it may be given

Autonomous coding agent

Consequence to people: Medium

Code AI operating in agent mode - taking actions across repositories, running commands, deploying

Internal informationMost outputs reviewedInternal use onlyRuns code or scriptsActs on its own
  • Review rhythm: Monthly check-in
  • Governance is mostly about: Safe everyday use; A person stays accountable; What it may be given

Governing Cursor in practice

  1. Name one person who owns Cursor in your business. Governance starts with a name.
  2. Write down what Cursor is used for. Certrak recognises 2 common uses: Code generation and review and Autonomous coding agent. Yours may differ; write down yours.
  3. Decide what Cursor may and may not be given. Internal business information is in scope, so name what stays out.
  4. A person reviews most outputs and exceptions are flagged. Agree what counts as an exception and who sees it.
  5. Cursor can run code or scripts without a person approving. Record which of these you allow, and who can change that.
  6. Look at this again every month, and sooner on any of these: industry incidents, vendor model updates and autonomy level changes.

What changed, and how Certrak responded

We record every check here, including the ones that changed nothing. A check that found no governance change proves we looked.

  1. Governance change Scheduled review

    Cursor Projects

    Anysphere shipped it 10 Sep 2026.

    Reviewed the changelog from 1 September to 13 October. Projects adds a cloud coordinator agent that plans work, runs many sub-agents, keeps shared memory across machines and can act on Slack, schedule or pull-request events without being prompted. Agent execution can run on self-hosted machines with computer use, mobile remote control of local agents is on by default outside Enterprise, and an app marketplace grants third-party apps write access to checks and reviews.

    How Certrak responded: Where Cursor is used for ordinary code assistance, it can now run code and act on events without a person starting each task. Owners are asked whether their people use Projects or event-driven agents; if they do, the system is treated as running code on its own and the matching controls apply.

    Vendor release note →