Work with us
AI tools / Developer and coding AI / Claude Code

How to govern Claude Code

An agent that reads, edits and runs code in your repositories, with the oversight that autonomy demands.

Anthropic · Reviewed quarterly, and when the vendor ships a capability change or a customer declares the tool · Last reviewed 16 Oct 2026

No governance change Reviewed the three newest versions. The changelog carries version numbers but no dates, so the release date here is the review date. Local transcripts now record each request's system prompt, tools and parameters, request bodies are compressed to Anthropic even with telemetry off, Claude in Slack can answer in channels shared with other organisations when an administrator enables it, and several sandbox and permission bypass fixes landed. No change to what the tool does without approval in its listed use patterns. Full changelog ↓

How Claude Code is used

We see two common ways businesses use Claude Code, and we govern each one on its own terms. If your team uses it differently, that is fine: you describe the use in your own words and Certrak works out the governance from what it actually does.

Code generation and review

Consequence to people: Low

Writing or reviewing code, with a developer in the loop

Internal informationEvery output reviewedInternal use only
  • Review rhythm: Annual review
  • Governance is mostly about: Safe everyday use; What it may be given; Checking what it produces

Autonomous coding agent

Consequence to people: Medium

Code AI operating in agent mode - taking actions across repositories, running commands, deploying

Internal informationMost outputs reviewedInternal use onlyRuns code or scriptsActs on its own
  • Review rhythm: Monthly check-in
  • Governance is mostly about: Safe everyday use; A person stays accountable; What it may be given

Governing Claude Code in practice

  1. Name one person who owns Claude Code in your business. Governance starts with a name.
  2. Write down what Claude Code is used for. Certrak recognises 2 common uses: Code generation and review and Autonomous coding agent. Yours may differ; write down yours.
  3. Decide what Claude Code may and may not be given. Internal business information is in scope, so name what stays out.
  4. A person reviews most outputs and exceptions are flagged. Agree what counts as an exception and who sees it.
  5. Claude Code can run code or scripts without a person approving. Record which of these you allow, and who can change that.
  6. Look at this again every month, and sooner on any of these: industry incidents, vendor model updates and autonomy level changes.

What changed, and how Certrak responded

We record every check here, including the ones that changed nothing. A check that found no governance change proves we looked.

  1. No governance change Scheduled review

    Claude Code changelog, versions 2.1.299 to 2.1.301

    Anthropic shipped it 16 Oct 2026.

    Reviewed the three newest versions. The changelog carries version numbers but no dates, so the release date here is the review date. Local transcripts now record each request's system prompt, tools and parameters, request bodies are compressed to Anthropic even with telemetry off, Claude in Slack can answer in channels shared with other organisations when an administrator enables it, and several sandbox and permission bypass fixes landed. No change to what the tool does without approval in its listed use patterns.

    Vendor release note →